The AR-15 rifle, also known as a “black gun” or “modern sporting rifle,” has endured a great deal of controversy over the years. It may be because these firearms look very similar to the ones used by the military, which some folks find intimidating, but the truth is that they function just like any other semi-automatic rifle and can only fire one bullet per trigger squeeze. What’s more, this much-misunderstood design can make the perfect first long gun for women. Here’s why:
1. They work for just about any body size
One of the toughest challenges for a woman who wishes to get into shooting long guns is finding one that works with our anatomy, not against it. A gun that’s too big is difficult to shoulder properly, which is not only uncomfortable to hold, but can result in increased felt recoil. Most long guns (except those designed specifically for smaller-statured shooters) are designed to fit a person of approximately 5’8″ or up…a full five inches taller than the average American woman. What’s more, women tend to have necks that are longer in proportion to our bodies than men do, which makes getting a good cheek weld difficult on a gun that’s too big. However, the AR-15 design features a stock that can be adjusted as easily as a car seat, and as quickly.
2. They are fun and easy to customize
Although many women are perfectly happy to own and shoot guns that look exactly as they did when they left the factory, some of us prefer to own a firearm that’s uniquely our own style. With literally thousands of different accessories available from retailers like Brownells, it’s easy to make your AR-15 perfect for your specific needs. Many AR-15 owners also enjoy painting the guns to reflect their unique aesthetic sensibilities. (For a rundown on how to do that, click here.)
3. They offer reduced recoil
Of course, many women, even beginners, tolerate recoil well. However, some of us—especially those new to shooting—find that a hard-kicking gun seriously ruins what should be a good time on the range. This is where the AR-15 really shines. The semi-automatic action absorbs much of the recoil, keeping it from impacting the shooter’s shoulder and face. Furthermore, the AR-15 is commonly chambered in .223 (or 5.56mm), which is a smaller caliber that doesn’t offer a great deal of recoil, although it’s still quite effective for target shooting and self-defense. Finally, as mentioned above, the fact that its fit is easily customizable allows the shooter to properly shoulder the rifle, which also reduces felt recoil.
4. They are extremely versatile
As with men, women enter the world of gun ownership for a variety of different reasons. Some are concerned about self-defense. Some wish to learn to compete in shooting matches. Others want to reduce animal pests around the house, or to hunt. Often, as time goes by, the new gun owner will decide to expand her horizons and try different aspects of gun ownership. The beauty of the AR-15 is that it’s capable of being the one gun that you use for all of the above. It’s an effective self-defense tool, accurate at long ranges for shooting competitions, and (depending on the laws in your specific jurisdiction) capable of cleanly taking predators and pest species.
If you’re a woman looking for your first rifle, give the AR-15 a try. You just might find it’s the perfect gun for all your needs.
We are very excited to announce that we are now offering a new option for class schedules. Starting March 30, we will be offering 2 hour classes in both Basic Handgun Fundamentals and Women’s Progressive Handgun Fundamentals. Students may choose to attend 4 weekly classes, 2 hours each week, rather than spending an entire 8 hours on the weekend for one class.
First session begins March 30th and continues every Monday night for 4 weeks. Class time: 6:00pm-8:00pm Location: Federal Way Indoor Range
Check out the website for more details and future dates! www.federalwayfirearmstraining.com
First session begin March 25th and continues every Wednesday afternoon for weeks. Class time: 3:00pm-5:00pm Location: Federal Way Indoor Range
Check out the website for more details and dates of future classes! www.womenandguns.co
Things you need to know about using your gun for self defense.
This is an article from The Armed Citizens Defense Network eJournal:
Attorney’s Book Outlines Aftermath Issues
An Interview with James Fleming
Interview by Gila Hayes
When armed citizens get into discussions about using force in self defense, it often exposes the depth of misunderstanding common to laypersons that cannot help but base expectations on popular culture and entertainment. Predictably, unpleasant revelations await one sucked into the maelstrom of the criminal justice system. Understanding how attorneys and the legal system work goes far to prevent disastrous surprises.
We recently asked Network Advisory Board member James B. Fleming, a trial attorney of more than 30 years experience, and a former law enforcement investigator, to identify common misunderstandings. What, we asked, are key problem areas? His answers are detailed and full of colorful illustrations, so we switch now to Q & A format to retain the flavor of the interview.
eJournal: Jim, I’m aware that you’ve just finished writing a book, Aftermath: Lessons in Self-Defense. That makes it a good time to ask you about what armed citizens should expect to encounter in the criminal justice system after using force in self defense. You’ve told me repeatedly that a number of nasty surprises await the unprepared, so perhaps today we could demystify the top three or four. Where should we start?
Fleming: First, the idea that you are going to have a conversation with the police and that everything is going to be OK could not be more inaccurate.
eJournal: OK, so to start with interaction with police. We’re programmed to expect the Miranda warning but also to expect responding officers to ask what happened. How do those two realities work together and what are the pitfalls?
Fleming: Well, suppose the client has said, “I will not answer any questions or give any statements until my attorney is present.” Particularly after the last two years of Supreme Court decisions, you have to SAY it: it has to be verbal. If you don’t, then anything you say, any facial expression, any body language, any gesture can be used against you.
In Salinas v. Kansas, the cops investigating a drive by shooting where two people were killed are confronted with a guy that is not saying anything to them. One cop finally says something to the effect, “Have you asked God to forgive you for gunning down those two people?” See, the guy hasn’t said a word to them, but he is looking at the cop and all of a sudden a single tear trickles down his cheek. The cop gets to testify to that in front of the jury; the jury convicts the guy in 17 minutes. End of story.
Of course, everybody went crazy and said, “You can’t do that! What about Miranda?” Nobody–the courts, the cops, the prosecutors–has liked Miranda since Miranda was handed down because so very few people have actually spent time sitting down and looking at what Miranda really does say and what Miranda doesn’t say, and deciding, “OK, then this is how we need to operate within that body of law.”
eJournal: In a nutshell, what does Miranda really say?
Fleming: If police have you in custody, before they question you, they have to read you your rights. If you say, “I’m not going to give you a statement until my attorney is present,” they might continue to question you, but even if they do, after that, nothing that you say [in response to questioning] can be used against you. But, suppose our fellow or lady gives a clear and unequivocal statement, “I will not answer any questions or provide any statements until my attorney is present.” So the cops say, “OK, will you please go sit down over there?” Two cops are standing in the middle of the room, one of them looks at the other and says, “I don’t know about you, but self defense? This is bullshit. This guy got executed.” They are not talking to her, but they make sure she hears it.
She comes up out of the chair, yelling, “That’s not true!” Well, what is she doing? She is waiving that clear and unequivocal statement of reliance upon her right to remain silent and the next thing you know, she has got diarrhea of the mouth and even if she does her very best to be perfectly honest–because of the issues that she is dealing with, what she is telling them could be miles from the truth and she wouldn’t even know it.
eJournal: Isn’t it commonly accepted that police who are involved in a shooting should insist on a 48- to 72-hour delay after the incident before making a formal statement to investigators?
Fleming: Well, the 72 hours is coming right from the International Association of Chiefs of Police. I am emphasizing more than I ever have before, in the immediate aftermath of the incident, you may think you are in a good position to talk to the police, but you are not. In writing the chapter of my book Aftermath, on the physiological, psychological and emotional issues that arise out of the high stress incident, I have been working with Alexis Artwohl, Ph.D. who for 18 years has worked as a critical incident forensic counselor where she sits down with cops that have been involved in shootings, debriefs and counsels them.
She refers anecdotally to officers in the immediate aftermath of the incident who haven’t got a clue what just happened, or their vision, memory, their perceptions of time and distance and actions are so horribly distorted they’re nowhere near accurate. They are not trying to make up a story, but what you are hearing from them in the immediate aftermath is pure garbage because of the tachycardia. This is something that is totally beyond the individual’s ability to control.
In the course of writing Aftermath, I spent time talking with a lot of cops, including those at the LEOSA annual training my wife, Lynne, and I teach. I asked them, if all you give after a shooting is your name and ID, do you think the first responders are going to think you are guilty of something? Their answer was, “What the hell do I care? These are not the people that make the decisions. They are the people that write the reports.”
The decisions are made by prosecutors who make the determination whether or not they are going to charge or if they are going to present to a grand jury and let the grand jury make the decision.
eJournal: If charging decisions are solely in the hands of the district attorney or prosecuting agency, can the defense attorney influence a prosecutor’s decision? If you are my attorney, what can you do on my behalf?
Fleming: This is the scary part. There may be something that I can do or there may not be anything that I can do. You may be dealing with a county attorney or a district attorney that has announced a philosophy that, “Nobody is going to take the law into their own hands in this county!” That means that they will charge. You are going to go to court or they are going to present it to the grand jury.
In MN I had one of the most righteous self-defense shoots I had ever seen. A guy was sitting at home after just getting back from picking up groceries. All of a sudden, he hears tremendous crashing and pounding downstairs. He arms himself and goes down the stairs. He is about half way down the stairs when he sees this guy smashing through the front door of his house, literally kicking the front door to kindling. My client has never seen him before and the guy does not say a word. My client is 5’ 6” and maybe weighs 125 pounds. The guy that comes through his door is about 6’ 4” and weighs about 300 pounds, as we find out later. My client points the 9mm at him, says, “I’m armed, get out of my house or I’ll shoot you.” The guy charges and attacks him.
Now, my client had not gone through any kind of training whatsoever; he was totally unprepared. The guy literally chases him through the house, catching him, beating on him, my guy getting away from him until he finally runs out on to his rear deck. When the guy comes through the door, he shoots him once and hits him low in the abdomen on the left side with one 9mm full metal jacket–not even a hollow point. Luckily it was enough to dissuade the guy, who all of a sudden realizes, “Oh, I’ve been shot.” He goes out and sits down underneath a tree holding his stomach, begging anybody who happened by to call the police.
My guy called the police. He gets charged with aggravated second-degree assault with a deadly weapon. Minnesota’s statute that authorizes use of deadly force says you can use deadly force if you believe that you or another is in imminent danger of death or grave bodily harm. We refer to that as crippling injury because people get all caught up with what does “great bodily harm” mean. Well, the side of your face fractured, arm broken, leg broken, eye put out, nose smashed, all of these could be potentially fatal, so the law says you can use deadly force if you have a reasonable belief that is what is coming at you.
You also have what’s known as the right to use deadly force “in defense of dwelling.” You can use deadly force to prevent the commission of a felony inside your place of abode. Legislators just can’t help themselves: they have to use words that make no sense to anybody else. Your place of abode could mean your travel trailer, your home, where you are living at the time that this incident takes place, it even could be a tent in your back yard.
So I go to the prosecutor and because I’ve known the prosecutor for 22 years and I say, “What the hell are you doing? Why are you charging this guy with second-degree aggravated assault?”
He says, “Well, we have a policy: you use a weapon in this county, we are going to charge you.”
I said, “What did you expect him to do?”
He said, “He could have left the house.”
I said, “You know as well as I do that the Castle Doctrine applies here.”
He said, “I don’t want to quibble about semantics with you. Can we talk about a plea?”
I said, “No, we can talk about a jury trial, because you don’t get to make that kind of a decision; you don’t get to take that authority away from the state legislature. I don’t care who you think you are. We are going to trial. Plus, I’m going to call every newspaper and every TV station and every radio station.” Now, I didn’t really call the media, but I wanted him to think that I would. They came back and agreed to dismiss the charge of second-degree aggravated assault.
eJournal: Was that the end of it?
Fleming: He had a criminal record because 15 years ago he and his friends decided it would be cute to take a snowmobile parked outside a bar up in the Minnesota North Country. Any Minnesotan that reads this will recognize the type of prank. Well, they went through the ice and the snowmobile went to the bottom of a lake. They were charged with theft of a motor vehicle and in MN theft of a motor vehicle is a crime of violence.
eJournal: So he was prohibited from possessing firearms.
Fleming: There was nothing we could do; they had him cold on that. The plea negotiation was that he agreed to receive a sentence of 90 days in jail. A felon in possession in MN normally is a mandatory five years in prison. He got 90 days, which became 60 days because they automatically lop off a third for what they called good time credit, plus with some other jail credit, so I think the grand total he served was 37 days.
eJournal: That’s a good example of working with the prosecuting agency to reach a reasonable outcome. What might have happened if you’d had to fight that second-degree aggravated assault charge at trial? You’ve said many times that lay persons rarely understand what the defense attorney can and cannot introduce in court to show the client’s innocence. What are some of the impediments you have been warning us about?
Fleming: The biggest impediment would be rules of evidence. Every criminal trial across the country whether on a federal or state level, whether that is in CA, NV, MN or NY, all those trials are conducted pursuant to the rules of evidence. There may be slight differences from state to state, but they are pretty much uniform across the country. The rules are there for a reason, but the lay person that hasn’t bounced up against them before will say, “Well, we get to bring in this!” Well, no you don’t.
For example, you’ve got a professional football quarterback accused of sexual assault. He wants to bring in the fact that the alleged victim has been willing to share her favors indiscriminately with a number of different football quarterbacks, so he says, “Well, this is going to straighten things out!” No, because the rules of evidence say it is not admissible.
eJournal: Or for a self-defense incident, we might want to highlight prior bad acts if we had to shoot someone with a history of assault.
Fleming: You can’t use a prior bad act to say, “This was predictable.” Rule 404B of the rules of evidence say, no, you can’t do that.
Hearsay is another one. People don’t understand hearsay. Basically, hearsay is all about the idea that you can’t testify that you heard Joe Blow say something about this incident unless Joe Blow is available to come up and testify. Now, that rule says hearsay excludes evidence of statements that are offered to prove the matter asserted therein where the proponent does not allow the other side to have the opportunity to cross-examine the individual who allegedly made the statement. Lawyers talk like that; it gives other people headaches. [Laughing]
People may say, “Yes, I understand that,” but lawyers have to say, “No, you don’t, because here are the exceptions to the rule.” Literally, what you are doing is threading a needle trying to see if you can get the thread all the way through this labyrinth. You keep running into dead ends, but there might be a side route that you can use. You try to determine, “Is this something that I can get into evidence?”
I want to get across that a trial is the worst-case scenario. If I can get this case resolved without that trial, by coming and presenting all of this stuff to the prosecutor over and over again, and say, “Let’s have a cup of coffee. Look, your investigator says that X happened, all right? We have looked at the crime scene. I’ve brought in an expert who’s been doing this for 30 years and my expert says that is impossible. Six months ago your investigator was a patrolman on the sheriff’s department; four months ago he took the test and now he’s a detective, but he is not really good at this yet. My expert will show that it wasn’t A, it was B, and here is why.”
eJournal: What are your odds of prevailing?
Fleming: There is no way to know. People want certainty, but it is not there because all of these cases are so very, very different.
eJournal: That’s understandable and it wasn’t really a fair question. As you note, there are a lot of variables, too many to cover in one short interview, but you’ve just written a book that can cover a lot more ground than we can in this short time. How can we get it so we can continue to learn from you?
Fleming: It is Aftermath: Lessons in Self Defense: What to Expect When the Shooting Stops due for release in March, 2015. Information on where to purchase the eBook or print copy will be available at my website: AftermathByJimFleming.com.
When: March 22, 2014 10:00am-6:00pm
Where: Federal Way Indoor Range
How to register: Go to the range or register online at: Women & Guns
If you are a graduate of our Basic Handgun Class, this is the next step in your training. During this one day course, you will be introduced to safely drawing from the holster, clearing malfunctions, shooting from cover, and drills to improve your marksmanship. Bring your own handgun, a sturdy belt and belt holster and 300 rounds of ammunition. Class begins promptly at 10:00am.
Come and join other women to learn these valuable skills and enjoy the camaraderie. Class is taught by the mother/daughter team from Women & Guns:
Janice Talaroc and Chelsea Kyger.
Reliable Semi-auto handgun
3 magazines for your handgun
Pants with belt loops and 1.5″ sturdy belt
Sturdy, rigid belt holster for your gun
Single or double magazine holder
Comfortable shoes, no open toes
No low cut shirts (brass is hot!)
300 rounds of ammunition in your caliber
Prerequisite: Basic Handgun Fundamentals or instructor permission.
Pregnant and nursing women are not allowed to attend classes due to possible health risks.
For information contact: Janice 253-217-3188 or email@example.com
Firearms Training Classes cannot be returned for refund. A minimum of 10 days notice prior to the start date of your scheduled class is required to request a reschedule. You must call 253-217-3188 to reschedule. Range personnel are unable to reschedule classes. All schedules subject to change.
Gun owners, PLEASE PREVENT THIS KIND OF TRAGEDY. LOCK UP YOUR GUNS! IF YOU OWN A GUN, IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. NO EXCUSES.
Originally posted on fox4kc.com:
[ooyala code=”E5ZzZ2cjqIkZMO-Amp661O1mZ0pQUCqj” player_id=”99b31ca60977447aac65383d61b8503b”]
ELMO, Mo. – An infant has died after being shot in the head in Northwest Missouri.
According to the Nodaway County Sheriff’s Office, the nine-month-old baby boy was shot shortly before nine o’clock Monday morning by his five-year-old brother at their residence, located at 101 S. Scott in Elmo, Missouri, which is just south of the Iowa border.
According to the Nodaway County Sheriff’s Office the mother of the two children said her five-year-old son shot her infant in the head with a paintball gun. But after an ambulance and law enforcement were dispatched to the location, it was determined the nine-month-old had been shot in the head with a .22 caliber magnum revolver.
Nodaway County Sheriff, Darren White, said the loaded gun had been kept on a shelf which was built into the headboard of the master bed. The infant was in a crib in that room…
View original 317 more words
February 1, 2015 is our next Women’s Progressive Handgun Class. If you have already attended a Basic Class, this is the next step. Mind set, learning to draw from the holster, shoot from cover, clear malfunctions, and more is covered in this excellent self defense based class. Register at Women and Guns
Excellent article on the importance of scenario based training. Just look at the numbers on the chart.
Originally posted on tacticalprofessor:
The house alarm sounded and the wife shot her husband through a closed bedroom door thinking he was an intruder, according to Fayetteville police.
Obviously, that was a ‘negative outcome.’ Therein lays the problem with simply having a gun without doing any scenario training with it. My research has brought me to the point where I am less concerned with the marksmanship aspects of personal protection than I am with 1) proper gunhandling and 2) appropriate decision-making. Those two items are almost completely absent from most gunowners’ repertoire.
There are a competing set of probabilities we have to consider in a home defense situation. If you have anyone else living in your home, the most likely probability is that the 3 a.m. bump you hear or shadow you see is, in fact, a member of your household. For sake of argument, let’s put that probability at nearly 100%. There…
View original 394 more words